Org chemistry drawing assignment Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Org chemistry drawing assignment - Coursework Example 3) Draw trans-1,3-dimethylcyclohexane and cis-1,3-dimethylcyclohexane as their most stable chair conformations. Label all non-favorable interactions, describe why they are unfavorable, and to what value (energy). Which is more stable, the trans or cis structure? All non-favorable 1,3-diaxial interactions are presented in the figure above. Such interactions are unfavorable because both methyl groups and hydrogens try to occupy the same space, which leads to destabilization of the molecule. Structure (I) should be highly unfavorable due to interaction between two methyl groups. As in the previous case, this destabilization is expressed in a value of several kJ/mole. Cis-1,3-dimethylcyclohexane represented in the rectangle is the most stable because both methyl groups occupy equatorial positions. 4) Draw trans-1,4-dimethylcyclohexane and cis-1,4-dimethylcyclohexane as their most stable chair conformations. Label all non-favorable interactions, describe why they are unfavorable, and to what value (energy). Which is more stable, the trans or cis structure? Non-favorable 1,3-diaxial interactions are shown in the figure above. Such interactions are unfavorable because both methyl groups and hydrogens try to occupy the same space, which leads to destabilization of the molecule. As in all previous cases, this destabilization is expressed in a value of several kJ/mole. Trans-1,4-dimethylcyclohexane represented in the rectangle is the most stable because both methyl groups occupy equatorial positions. Bromine is significantly bigger then ethyl substituent. For this reason, it will produce less steric interactions if bromine is in the equatorial position. For this reason, the conformation represented in the rectangular will be the most stable. It is expected that the most amount of cis-1-bromo-4-ethylcyclohexane will be with the equatorial

Final Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 7

Final - Essay Example There were several aspects responsible for the ineffectiveness that was part of Decision Tech. one of the elements related to effective teams is that combination of people results in better and more efficient work while individualistic work is not as productive. In comparison, the employees within Decision Tech were simply busy in leg pulling, competing against each other and not trusting each other to function as a coherent and cohesive team. Team mates are supposed to nurture and help each other grow in order to be an effective team. However, in Decision Tech this was not the case at all, as most employees were busy with their own work to focus on anyone else. Each member was focused on making sure they could get ahead instead. This was a clear situation where the organizational performance was being jeopardized. The executive team was such that people would call them the staff within the organization. The main reasons behind this were that the executive body would fight against each other, not letting the other succeed. As a result, in most meetings, it was noticed that the executive team could not come to any mutual decisions successfully. Individually, each person was brilliant in his or her job and was working perfectly fine for the organization, however, collectively, they were not being productive as a team. The team had developed a culture of its own where it was hostile and silent in most cases and the team could not perform well due to these issues in the culture of the executive team. Most elements of the norming stage were not even reached where the team would tend to ignore differences and move towards cohesiveness. Instead, the team was primarily stuck in the forming stage where the team mates were still trying to adjust to each other and were more inclined to work independently than as a team. It was noted that the team had not reached all the four stages of team development at all. From the four stages of team development, the executive team at